35 Why Is Daniel 14 Not In The Bible

Three Angels Messages of Revelation 14
Three Angels Messages of Revelation 14 from www.threeangelsmessages.us

Why is Daniel 14 not in the Bible?

The Missing Chapter

When one delves into the ancient texts of the Bible, it becomes apparent that there are some discrepancies and missing pieces. One such intriguing omission is the absence of Daniel chapter 14. This mysterious absence has puzzled scholars and theologians for centuries. In this article, we will explore the possible reasons behind the exclusion of Daniel 14 from the Bible and its implications on our understanding of the book of Daniel.

An Overview of the Book of Daniel

Before we dive into the missing chapter, let us first understand the context of the book of Daniel. This biblical book is categorized as a prophetic and apocalyptic text, attributed to the prophet Daniel who lived during the Babylonian exile in the 6th century BCE. The book consists of twelve chapters and is divided into two main sections: the historical narratives in the first six chapters, and the prophetic visions in the remaining six chapters. It is within this latter section that chapter 14 is mysteriously absent.

The Contents of Daniel 14

Although Daniel chapter 14 is not found within the canonical Bible, it does exist in certain versions of the Septuagint, an ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible. The chapter is a self-contained narrative featuring Daniel's encounter with the pagan idol Bel and the subsequent downfall of the idol worshipers. It is a tale of deception, divine intervention, and the triumph of true faith.

Possible Explanations for the Absence

The exclusion of Daniel 14 from the Bible has sparked numerous theories and conjectures. While we may never have a definitive answer, here are some plausible explanations:

1. Manuscript Errors

One possibility is that the omission of Daniel 14 was simply an error made during the process of copying and transmitting the ancient manuscripts. The Bible has undergone countless translations and transcriptions throughout history, and it is not uncommon for mistakes or omissions to occur. It is possible that a scribe or translator unintentionally skipped or overlooked Daniel 14, leading to its exclusion from the canon.

2. Canonical Considerations

Another possible reason for the absence of Daniel 14 is related to the process of canonization. The biblical canon, or the authorized list of books included in the Bible, was not fixed until several centuries after the time of Daniel. During this process, certain books and chapters were scrutinized and evaluated by religious authorities. It is plausible that Daniel 14 did not meet the criteria set forth by these authorities and was consequently left out of the final canon.

3. Historical Context

Considering the historical context in which the book of Daniel was written, some scholars argue that the exclusion of Daniel 14 may have been a deliberate choice. The book of Daniel was composed during a time of intense cultural and religious conflict, as the Israelites were under foreign domination. The absence of Daniel 14 could be seen as an intentional omission to avoid exacerbating tensions between the Jewish community and their pagan rulers.

Implications for Interpretation

Although Daniel 14 is not officially recognized as part of the biblical canon, its existence in certain ancient texts raises important questions about the interpretation of the book of Daniel as a whole.

1. Historical Accuracy

The inclusion of Daniel 14 in some versions of the Septuagint suggests that the story was known and accepted by certain Jewish communities in the past. This raises the question of whether other aspects of the book of Daniel could also be historically accurate but have been excluded or overlooked in the canonical Bible.

2. Theological Significance

The absence of Daniel 14 prompts us to reflect on the theological implications of the book of Daniel. What message does its exclusion convey? Perhaps it is a reminder that the Bible, as we know it, is not an exhaustive or infallible source of divine revelation. It challenges us to approach the scriptures with humility and an openness to alternative perspectives.


While the reasons behind the exclusion of Daniel 14 from the Bible may remain shrouded in mystery, its absence invites us to explore the complexities and uncertainties of biblical interpretation. Whether due to manuscript errors, canonical considerations, or historical context, the absence of this chapter reminds us of the human element involved in the compilation and interpretation of sacred texts. It serves as a reminder that our understanding of the Bible is a continuous journey, open to new discoveries and perspectives.